Post by account_disabled on Feb 20, 2024 4:28:03 GMT -5
The have no audience without organic search results. Those results come from the collective content of the web. As Google replaces that content and sends more clicks back to themselves I do believe that the fundamental pact that Googles success was built on is gradually being broken. Googles garden was built on our collective property and it does feel like were slowly being herded out of our own backyards. We also have to consider the deeper question of content ownership. If Google chooses to pursue private data partnerships such as with Live Results or the original Knowledge Graph then they own that data or at least are leasing it fairly.
It may seem unfair that theyre displacing us but they have the right to Greece Mobile Number List do so. Much of the Knowledge Graph is built on humancurated sources such as Wikidata i.e. Wikipedia. While Google undoubtedly has an ironclad agreement with Wikipedia what about the people who originally contributed and edited that content Would they have done so knowing their content could ultimately displace other content creators including possibly their own websites in Google results Are those contributors willing participants in this experiment The question of ownership isnt as easy as it seems.
If Google extracts the data we provide as part of the pact such as with Featured Snippets and People Also Ask results and begins to wall off those portions of the garden then we have every right to protest. Even the concept of a partnership isnt always blackandwhite. Some job listing providers Ive spoken with privately felt pressured to enter Googles new jobs portal out of fear of cutting off the paths to their own gardens but they werent happy to see the new walls built. Google is also trying to survive. Search has to evolve and it has to answer questions and fit a rapidly changing world of device formats from desktop to mobile to voice. I think the time has come.
It may seem unfair that theyre displacing us but they have the right to Greece Mobile Number List do so. Much of the Knowledge Graph is built on humancurated sources such as Wikidata i.e. Wikipedia. While Google undoubtedly has an ironclad agreement with Wikipedia what about the people who originally contributed and edited that content Would they have done so knowing their content could ultimately displace other content creators including possibly their own websites in Google results Are those contributors willing participants in this experiment The question of ownership isnt as easy as it seems.
If Google extracts the data we provide as part of the pact such as with Featured Snippets and People Also Ask results and begins to wall off those portions of the garden then we have every right to protest. Even the concept of a partnership isnt always blackandwhite. Some job listing providers Ive spoken with privately felt pressured to enter Googles new jobs portal out of fear of cutting off the paths to their own gardens but they werent happy to see the new walls built. Google is also trying to survive. Search has to evolve and it has to answer questions and fit a rapidly changing world of device formats from desktop to mobile to voice. I think the time has come.